FAIRPRENEURS – SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS FOUNDATIONS WORKSHOP

 

 

1. Basic Information

Method Title: Sustainable Business Foundations Workshop: Triple Bottom Line, Ethics, CSR and Long-Term Thinking

Source Project: Fairpreneurs – Ethical, Green, Youth Entrepreneurship Education

Project Website: https://fairpreneurs.eu/

Additional Official Project Pages:

About our project

https://fairpreneurs.euopen-educational-resources/

Knowledge Sharing Hub

Fairpreneurs Case Study Compendium & Curriculum

Project Reference: 2022-1-PL01-KA220-YOU-000087822

Source Material Used: User-provided PPTX: “Module 1 – Sustainable Business Practices / Sustainable Business Foundations”

Country / Scope: European partnership / transnational Erasmus+ project

Primary CIVIKI Topic(s): Sustainability; Entrepreneurship

Secondary CIVIKI Topic(s): Civic engagement and active citizenship; Inclusion of disadvantaged groups

Keywords / Tags: triple bottom line, sustainable entrepreneurship, ethical business, CSR, environmental stewardship, youth entrepreneurship, SDGs, fair economy, responsible business, long-term thinking

 

2. Overview

Short Description: This method turns the content of Fairpreneurs Module 1 into a practical workshop where learners design a business idea and test it through five lenses: economic viability, environmental stewardship, social responsibility, ethical decision-making, and long-term resilience. Participants move from idea generation to a mini sustainability diagnosis, a responsibility action plan, and a final strategic reflection.

Purpose of the Method: To help learners understand that entrepreneurship should not be reduced to profit alone. The method supports participants in developing a business idea that is realistic, socially responsible, environmentally aware, and aligned with broader community and sustainability goals.

Learning Outcomes (Skills / Knowledge / Attitudes):

  • Skills: business idea development, critical thinking, stakeholder analysis, ethical decision-making, basic sustainability planning, teamwork, presentation skills.
  • Knowledge: Triple Bottom Line (people, planet, profit), corporate social responsibility, environmental stewardship, transparency, SDG alignment, long-term strategic thinking.
  • Attitudes: responsibility, fairness, openness to impact measurement, willingness to consider community needs, and commitment to more ethical forms of entrepreneurship.

 

3. Target Group

Target Group: Youth educators, adult educators, youth workers, VET trainers, university facilitators, students, young entrepreneurs, and aspiring social or green entrepreneurs.

Age Range: 16+

Group Size: 8–24 participants is ideal; can also be adapted for smaller groups or one-to-one coaching.

EQF Level (optional): EQF 3–5, adaptable upward for higher education or entrepreneurship incubator contexts.

Required Prior Knowledge: No specialist prior knowledge is required. Basic familiarity with entrepreneurship or sustainability vocabulary is useful but not essential.

 

4. Practical Details

Duration: Approx. 150–180 minutes (can also be split into two shorter sessions). If time is limited, the workshop can focus on one sustainability aspect, such as environmental, social, or economic sustainability.

 

Setting (online / offline / hybrid): Offline, online, or hybrid.

 

Group Work / Individual: Combination of individual reflection, pair work, small-group work, and short plenary presentations.

 

Materials / Tools Needed:

  • Flipchart paper or large worksheets for group work
  • Sticky notes or paper cards
  • Pens / markers
  • Printed or digital “Triple Bottom Line Canvas”
  • Printed or digital “Ethical Dilemma Card”
  • Printed or digital “Mini Eco-Audit Sheet”
  • Printed or digital “CSR and Transparency Action Plan” template
  • Optional projector and internet connection for showing examples or SDG references
  • Optional collaborative tools for online delivery (Jamboard, Miro, Google Docs, Padlet, Canva whiteboard, etc.)

 

5. Method Description (Step-by-Step)

Step 1 – Warm-up: What makes a business “good”?

Ask participants to write three words they associate with a successful business. Collect answers on a board or shared screen. Then ask: Is profit enough? Introduce the idea that a business also affects people, communities, and the environment.

 

Step 2 – Introduce the Triple Bottom Line (People, Planet, Profit)

Briefly explain the Triple Bottom Line and connect it to the project language: ethical, green, youth entrepreneurship education. For beginners, explain theoretical concepts in simple language and use practical examples. For example, describe the Triple Bottom Line as three simple questions: Is the business good for people? Is it good for the planet? Can it make enough money to continue?  Give one simple example of a business that makes money but harms workers or the environment, and contrast it with one that balances all three dimensions.

Include one or more short business case studies showing how real businesses combine economic viability with environmental and social responsibility. Participants briefly discuss what makes each example sustainable and what could be improved.

 

Step 3 – Form small groups and choose a business idea

Put participants into groups of 3–5. Each group chooses or invents a simple business idea. Encourage ideas that are realistic and relevant to learners’ contexts, such as repair services, sustainable catering, community gardening, upcycling products, educational workshops, or local digital services with a social mission. Where possible, encourage participants to develop business ideas that respond to needs or opportunities in their own community.

 

Step 4 – Complete the Triple Bottom Line Canvas

Each group receives a canvas with three sections: People, Planet, Profit. They must fill in: Who benefits? Who may be harmed? What resources are used? What waste or emissions may be created? How does the idea generate income? What makes the idea fair and sustainable?

 

Step 5 – Add a civic and community lens

Groups identify how their business idea could contribute to society beyond direct sales. Prompt questions: Does it support inclusion? Does it respond to a local problem? Does it improve access, fairness, participation, or awareness in the community? This step strengthens the link with active citizenship and the CIVIKI wiki perspective.

 

Step 6 – Ethical dilemma challenge

Give each group a short dilemma linked to their idea. Example: a supplier is cheaper but has doubtful labour practices; a product is profitable but uses unsustainable packaging; a marketing claim sounds attractive but exaggerates the environmental benefit. Groups must decide what to do and justify their choice using the principles of integrity, transparency, fairness, and accountability.

 

Step 7 – Conduct a mini eco-audit

Groups now assess their own business idea through a practical sustainability check. Ask them to list: energy use, materials used, expected waste, transport needs, packaging choices, and one likely environmental risk. Then they must propose at least three realistic improvements, such as sourcing locally, reducing waste, offering repair, choosing refill systems, or using lower-impact materials.

 

Step 8 – Build a CSR and transparency action plan

Each group completes a short action plan with four fields: 1) social commitment, 2) environmental commitment, 3) transparency practice, and 4) one metric they will monitor. Example metrics: % recycled materials used, number of local partners, staff training sessions, community beneficiaries, energy reduction target.

 

Step 9 – Long-term thinking scenario

Ask groups to imagine one future challenge: regulation changes, rising energy prices, material scarcity, customer demand for more transparency, or a reputational crisis. They discuss how the business could adapt without abandoning its core values. This step develops resilience and strategic foresight.

 

Step 10 – Group presentation and feedback

Each group presents its sustainable business concept in 3–5 minutes. The audience gives feedback using three prompts: What is strong? What could be improved? What makes this idea genuinely fair and sustainable? The facilitator helps distinguish between superficial “green” claims and meaningful responsible practice.

 

Step 11 – Individual reflection and exit ticket

Each participant writes a short response to two questions: What changed in my view of entrepreneurship? What is one criterion I would now use to judge whether a business is truly sustainable? This creates individual ownership of learning.

 

6. Pedagogical Approach

Methods used:

  • Collaborative learning
  • Problem-based learning
  • Business idea prototyping
  • Case-based ethical reasoning
  • Guided reflection
  • Peer feedback
  • Sustainability planning

 

Why this approach is effective: The method combines theory and action, which reflects the Fairpreneurs pedagogic approach of practical, accessible and engaging learning. Learners do not only hear about sustainability; they apply it to concrete business decisions. This makes abstract ideas such as transparency, environmental stewardship, or social responsibility easier to understand, debate and transfer to real entrepreneurial contexts.

 

7. Inclusion & Accessibility

How inclusion is ensured: The activity values multiple forms of participation: speaking, writing, drawing, planning, and presenting. Roles can be distributed flexibly within each group so that participants contribute according to their strengths. The business ideas can be adapted to local realities, different socioeconomic contexts, and varying levels of entrepreneurial confidence.

 

Adaptations for disadvantaged groups:

  • Use simplified language and explain key terms such as “stakeholder”, “transparency”, or “CSR” with examples.
  • Provide visual templates and sentence starters for participants with lower literacy or limited confidence in English.
  • Allow oral responses instead of written ones where needed.
  • Offer extra time and facilitator support for participants new to entrepreneurship.
  • Invite examples connected to real barriers faced by disadvantaged groups, such as transport limitations, lack of access to jobs, discrimination, or limited start-up resources.
  • For mixed-ability groups, use role cards (speaker, note-taker, timekeeper, sustainability checker) to support participation.

 

8. Sustainability Aspect

Relevance to sustainability: This method is directly centred on sustainability. It helps participants understand that sustainable entrepreneurship involves balancing economic viability with social equity and environmental responsibility. It promotes the logic of the SDGs, encourages responsible consumption and production, and trains learners to question whether a business model creates long-term value rather than short-term gain only.

Environmental dimension: Resource use, waste, emissions, packaging, and practical improvement measures are built into the activity through the eco-audit step.

Social dimension: Fair labour, inclusion, community benefit, stakeholder well-being, and responsible communication are explored through the civic lens and CSR planning.

Economic dimension: Learners still work on viability, value creation, and resilience, making the method realistic for entrepreneurship education.

 

9. Evaluation & Feedback

Evaluation methods:

  • Observation of group participation and quality of discussion
  • Review of the completed Triple Bottom Line Canvas
  • Review of the mini eco-audit and CSR action plan
  • Assessment of the group presentation
  • Individual exit ticket / reflection note

 

Tools used (self / peer / teacher): Self-assessment, peer feedback, and facilitator assessment.

Suggested assessment criteria: Relevance of the business idea, understanding of sustainability principles, ability to identify trade-offs, feasibility of proposed actions, and clarity of ethical reasoning.

 

10. Output / Result

Final outcome: Each group produces a mini sustainable business concept package consisting of: 1) a Triple Bottom Line Canvas, 2) an ethical decision rationale, 3) a mini eco-audit, and 4) a short CSR and transparency action plan. Individually, participants also produce a written or oral reflection on what responsible entrepreneurship means.

 

Visible evidence of learning: Completed canvases, group presentations, action plans, reflection notes, and facilitator observations.

 

11. Transferability

How can this method be adapted:

  • For schools: simplify the business ideas and focus more on awareness and community impact.
  • For youth work: connect the ideas to local needs, volunteering, and social innovation.
  • For adult education: deepen the planning and apply the method to real start-up ideas.
  • For online delivery: use shared digital whiteboards and breakout rooms.
  • For entrepreneurship incubators: expand the action plan into a longer business model canvas or pilot plan.
  • For inclusion-oriented programmes: ask groups to design businesses that reduce a specific barrier faced by a disadvantaged group.

 

Why it is suitable for the CIVIKI Wiki: The method is modular, practical, discussion-rich, and easy to reuse across different sectors. It can support sustainability education, youth entrepreneurship, civic participation, and responsible innovation, which makes it especially valuable as a wiki entry for educators and facilitators.

For shorter workshops, select one sustainability aspect and focus the activities and discussion on this area.

 

12. Additional Resources

Official project resources:

  • Fairpreneurs homepage: https://fairpreneurs.eu/
  • About the project: https://fairpreneurs.eu/about/
  • Fairpreneurs Case Study Compendium & Curriculum: https://fairpreneurs.eu/fairpreneurs-case-study-compendium-curriculum/
  • Open Educational Resources page: https://fairpreneurs.eu/open-educational-resources/
  • Knowledge Sharing Hub: https://fairpreneurs.eu/knowledge-sharing-hub/
  • Source file used for this method sheet: user-provided PPTX “Module 1 – Sustainable Business Practices / Sustainable Business Foundations”

 

Additional reliable references:

  • United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: https://sdgs.un.org/goals
  • European Commission / JRC – EntreComp: The Entrepreneurship Competence Framework: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/entrecomp-entrepreneurship-competence-framework_en
  • OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct: https://mneguidelines.oecd.org/
  • UN Global Compact – Sustainable Development Goals: https://unglobalcompact.org/sdgs/about
  • International Labour Organization – Decent Work: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/decent-work/lang–en/index.htm